- Enelamah, Ezekwesili worried over rising debts
James Emejo, Kasim Sumaina in Abuja and Nume Ekeghe in Lokoja
The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN)
Governor, Mr. Godwin Emefiele, wednesday reiterated that the bank’s
restriction of foreign exchange access to 41 import items, three years
ago, was in national interest, explaining that it helped to save the
economy from collapse.
Emefiele in a keynote address he
delivered at a seminar for journalists in Lokoja with the theme:
“Monetary Policy Implementation amidst Global Economic Protectionism,”
said although the policy was restrictive of trade, he explained that it
was necessary to protect the economy from the importation of items that
could dampen the local production and economic growth.
The CBN had in July 2015, restricted 41
items, including vegetable oil, poultry products, toothpicks, cosmetics,
plastic and rubber products, among others, from accessing foreign
exchange from the interbank foreign exchange market. Importers of the
restricted items were asked to source their forex requirements from
autonomous sources.
Emefiele, who was represented by the CBN Director, Monetary Policy Department, Mr. Moses Tule, noted that in today’s world, countries have used trade protection repeatedly as a policy to resolve negative perceptions and shocks.
He said, “In other words, should Nigeria
with insatiable taste for foreign goods to the detriment of the
domestic economic realities (unemployment and imported inflation) throw
its borders open to indiscriminate importation of goods and services.
“This was the prevailing condition in
Nigeria before the introduction of restriction of official foreign
exchange for the importation of 41 items.
“It was an eclectic policy carefully
crafted with a view to reversing the multiple challenges of dwindling
foreign reserves, contracting Gross Domestic Production -recession and
an embarrassing rise in the level of unemployment confronting the
economy.
“The implementation of the 41 items, in
addition to the other complementary macroeconomic policies, no doubt,
was effective in lifting the Nigerian economy out of recession.
“For example, the real Gross Domestic
Product (GDP) grew by 1.40 per cent in the third quarter of 2017, up
from 0.72 per cent, and contraction of 0.91 per cent in the second and
first quarter of 2017, respectively. Also, there has been improved
reserve accretion to the country’s reserve.”
The CBN governor noted that given the
salutary effects on the economy; it could be argued that the “stance of
classical economists that trade protectionism notwithstanding, to
override the utility of selective protection in form of the 41 items to
resolve the challenges facing the economy can hardly be overemphasised.”
He added, “Pragmatic economic
nationalism, therefore, would ordinarily vote in favour of protecting
the domestic economy, as long as it does not infringe upon the tenets of
“beggar-thy-neighbour policies.”
He also said protectionism does not
refer to the restriction of trade between nations, utilising means such
as tariffs on imported goods, restrictive quotas, and a variety of other
inhibitive government regulations, designed to discourage imports and
prevent the foreign dominance of local markets.
“Protectionism directly contrasts with the system of free trade in which the trading in goods and services between or within countries flows unobstructed by trade restrictions.
“At the heart of protectionist policies
is the desire to spur the domestic economy for enhanced local production
and to discourage dumping in order to protect domestic industries from
foreign take-over or competition,” he added.
Enelamah Decries High Interest on Nigeria’s Debt
Meanwhile, the Minister of Industry,
Trade and Investment, Dr. Okechukwu Enelamah, has said the country’s
rising debt stock should not be the source of concern to Nigerians but
the attendant high interest accrual on the loans.
He said the debt to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ratio was still under 20 percent and within a comfortable threshold.
Nigeria’s total domestic and foreign
debt stock stood at N22.38 trillion and $73.21 billion respectively, as
at June 30, 2018, according to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS).
Speaking in an interview with THISDAY, against the backdrop of concerns over the country’s rising debt profile, he said the country must be careful about the sources of the borrowings with regards to high interest charges on the loans.
He said, “First in terms of actual
numbers- debt as a percentage of GDP for instance, you find that Nigeria
is probably still under 20 per cent, which broadly speaking will be
considered acceptable compared to those of other countries.
“However, the interest on the debt is an
issue- which then tells you what the real problem is. Nigeria has a
revenue problem not a debt problem because debt to GDP is just under 20
per cent.
“It’s like somebody who has a mortgage
on his house, the mortgage may be reasonable but if he doesn’t have a
job- he had better go and get a job- he can decide to move out of the
house but he has to live somewhere.
“So my view that we need to ratchet up
and step up the revenue profile of the government and I will tell you
why; our revenue to GDP is six percent, which is abysmally low and the
reason is that unfortunately we don’t have a tax paying culture.”
He said, “A system that’s based on oil
revenues that’s shared across the tiers of government is a recipe for
abdication of responsibility because it looks as if the money is
dropping from upstairs.
“Whereas if it’s like in other countries where the money is built up, the people actually feel that government owes them because they are now funding the government.
“Whereas if it’s like in other countries where the money is built up, the people actually feel that government owes them because they are now funding the government.
“And I think Nigeria should get back
there which is also part of the diversification of the economy. What is
clear is that the revenue from oil is not enough, which is why it’s just
six percent.
“So, I do agree that we have work to do
but I will say that work is to increase our revenue to GDP and certainly
do it in a way that is sustainable and robust. What we have now is
fragile which is basically dependent on oil revenue.”
The minister, however, disagreed with
suggestions that President Muhammadu Buhari lacked a capable economic
management team to turn around the fortunes of the country as his
cabinet ministers appeared to be incompetent.
He insisted that Buhari had put round pegs in round roles in his choice of political appointees.
“I can speak for myself but if you know
their background, you’ll know they fit. I mean, I don’t want to start
calling names but if you look at Chief Audu Ogbeh and agriculture, I
mean, he is so passionate about it.
“So you can go step by step. My sense is
that we actually have round pegs in round holes. However, the point I’m
trying to make is that we are very quick to criticise- I have to admit
that we have a long way to go but my view is that collectively as a
country, we need to keep reinforcing the social contract and you’ll find
that the leadership at the ministerial level will get stronger and
stronger.”
Nigeria’s Rising Debt Very Scary, Says Ezekwesili
Also speaking on the economy, former
Minister of Education and Senior Economic Advisor, African Economic
Development Policy Initiative (AEDPI), Dr. Oby Ezekwesili, has described
Nigeria’s rising debt as very scary and a source for concern.
Ezekwesili, while speaking to the press,
yesterday at the sidelines of the Morocco-Nigeria Relations event with
the theme: Enhancing Opportunities for Growth and Development in Abuja,
stated that the country does have a debt issue.
According to her, “You can’t deal with the revenue issue in isolation from the debt issue. The truth is that you have different indicators that you use in measuring your debt sustainability. The one that the government likes, is the one that says to it that you have plenty of headroom to borrow and that’s the one that measures the percentage of the ratio to debt and the GDP.
“It has become a blunt instrument,
because if you’re not with the capacity to service your debt, then you
are already in crisis, you’re in trouble. You won’t even produce any
additional GDP.
“Today, our GDP, our debt service to revenue is 69 per cent hovering around 70 per cent. That’s very scary, so it is something that needs to be worked on. We need to look at the kind of reforms that will enlarge the productivity of our GDP as it is and triple it as much as possible.”
Ezekwesili added, “Our own GDP is about
$375 billion today, our GDP per capital is about $1,968. That of Morocco
109 billion for the GDP and 3,109 GDP per capital.
“Now, these are low levels, these are
low numbers. We have the capacity to triple these GDP levels. The more
that we can collaborate, the more that we can find regional integration
basis, to do things with business to business, government to government
and people to people. The better for the two countries.
“By so doing, it can then be the drivers
of even more integration within not just our sub region but the
continent, and then to look towards the rest of the world on the basis
of higher productivity and competitiveness”.
The presidential candidate of the Allied Congress Party of Nigeria (ACPN), however said, “Until we are able to think in a very holistic and comprehensive way about this, we might be continuously substituting the necessary visionary reforms that we need in Key sectors of the economy for debt.”
On his part, Managing Director, OCP
Policy Center, Karim El Anynaoui, said over the past three, four years,
Morocco and Nigeria had deepened their relations.
He noted that there are things happening
on the ground. Sighting the fertilizer sector as an example, he said
that his country had been supporting the presidential fertilizer
initiative in Nigeria.
According to him, “We made sure to
provide appropriate, tailor made and affordable price for the farmers.
So, there are things going on, and there are other sectors where
discussions and potential for cooperation is ongoing, particularly in
the energy sector.”
- Enelamah, Ezekwesili worried over rising debts
James Emejo, Kasim Sumaina in Abuja and Nume Ekeghe in Lokoja
The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN)
Governor, Mr. Godwin Emefiele, wednesday reiterated that the bank’s
restriction of foreign exchange access to 41 import items, three years
ago, was in national interest, explaining that it helped to save the
economy from collapse.
Emefiele in a keynote address he
delivered at a seminar for journalists in Lokoja with the theme:
“Monetary Policy Implementation amidst Global Economic Protectionism,”
said although the policy was restrictive of trade, he explained that it
was necessary to protect the economy from the importation of items that
could dampen the local production and economic growth.
The CBN had in July 2015, restricted 41
items, including vegetable oil, poultry products, toothpicks, cosmetics,
plastic and rubber products, among others, from accessing foreign
exchange from the interbank foreign exchange market. Importers of the
restricted items were asked to source their forex requirements from
autonomous sources.
Emefiele, who was represented by the CBN Director, Monetary Policy Department, Mr. Moses Tule, noted that in today’s world, countries have used trade protection repeatedly as a policy to resolve negative perceptions and shocks.
He said, “In other words, should Nigeria
with insatiable taste for foreign goods to the detriment of the
domestic economic realities (unemployment and imported inflation) throw
its borders open to indiscriminate importation of goods and services.
“This was the prevailing condition in
Nigeria before the introduction of restriction of official foreign
exchange for the importation of 41 items.
“It was an eclectic policy carefully
crafted with a view to reversing the multiple challenges of dwindling
foreign reserves, contracting Gross Domestic Production -recession and
an embarrassing rise in the level of unemployment confronting the
economy.
“The implementation of the 41 items, in
addition to the other complementary macroeconomic policies, no doubt,
was effective in lifting the Nigerian economy out of recession.
“For example, the real Gross Domestic
Product (GDP) grew by 1.40 per cent in the third quarter of 2017, up
from 0.72 per cent, and contraction of 0.91 per cent in the second and
first quarter of 2017, respectively. Also, there has been improved
reserve accretion to the country’s reserve.”
The CBN governor noted that given the
salutary effects on the economy; it could be argued that the “stance of
classical economists that trade protectionism notwithstanding, to
override the utility of selective protection in form of the 41 items to
resolve the challenges facing the economy can hardly be overemphasised.”
He added, “Pragmatic economic
nationalism, therefore, would ordinarily vote in favour of protecting
the domestic economy, as long as it does not infringe upon the tenets of
“beggar-thy-neighbour policies.”
He also said protectionism does not
refer to the restriction of trade between nations, utilising means such
as tariffs on imported goods, restrictive quotas, and a variety of other
inhibitive government regulations, designed to discourage imports and
prevent the foreign dominance of local markets.
“Protectionism directly contrasts with the system of free trade in which the trading in goods and services between or within countries flows unobstructed by trade restrictions.
“At the heart of protectionist policies
is the desire to spur the domestic economy for enhanced local production
and to discourage dumping in order to protect domestic industries from
foreign take-over or competition,” he added.
Enelamah Decries High Interest on Nigeria’s Debt
Meanwhile, the Minister of Industry,
Trade and Investment, Dr. Okechukwu Enelamah, has said the country’s
rising debt stock should not be the source of concern to Nigerians but
the attendant high interest accrual on the loans.
He said the debt to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ratio was still under 20 percent and within a comfortable threshold.
Nigeria’s total domestic and foreign
debt stock stood at N22.38 trillion and $73.21 billion respectively, as
at June 30, 2018, according to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS).
Speaking in an interview with THISDAY, against the backdrop of concerns over the country’s rising debt profile, he said the country must be careful about the sources of the borrowings with regards to high interest charges on the loans.
He said, “First in terms of actual
numbers- debt as a percentage of GDP for instance, you find that Nigeria
is probably still under 20 per cent, which broadly speaking will be
considered acceptable compared to those of other countries.
“However, the interest on the debt is an
issue- which then tells you what the real problem is. Nigeria has a
revenue problem not a debt problem because debt to GDP is just under 20
per cent.
“It’s like somebody who has a mortgage
on his house, the mortgage may be reasonable but if he doesn’t have a
job- he had better go and get a job- he can decide to move out of the
house but he has to live somewhere.
“So my view that we need to ratchet up
and step up the revenue profile of the government and I will tell you
why; our revenue to GDP is six percent, which is abysmally low and the
reason is that unfortunately we don’t have a tax paying culture.”
He said, “A system that’s based on oil
revenues that’s shared across the tiers of government is a recipe for
abdication of responsibility because it looks as if the money is
dropping from upstairs.
“Whereas if it’s like in other countries where the money is built up, the people actually feel that government owes them because they are now funding the government.
“Whereas if it’s like in other countries where the money is built up, the people actually feel that government owes them because they are now funding the government.
“And I think Nigeria should get back
there which is also part of the diversification of the economy. What is
clear is that the revenue from oil is not enough, which is why it’s just
six percent.
“So, I do agree that we have work to do
but I will say that work is to increase our revenue to GDP and certainly
do it in a way that is sustainable and robust. What we have now is
fragile which is basically dependent on oil revenue.”
The minister, however, disagreed with
suggestions that President Muhammadu Buhari lacked a capable economic
management team to turn around the fortunes of the country as his
cabinet ministers appeared to be incompetent.
He insisted that Buhari had put round pegs in round roles in his choice of political appointees.
“I can speak for myself but if you know
their background, you’ll know they fit. I mean, I don’t want to start
calling names but if you look at Chief Audu Ogbeh and agriculture, I
mean, he is so passionate about it.
“So you can go step by step. My sense is
that we actually have round pegs in round holes. However, the point I’m
trying to make is that we are very quick to criticise- I have to admit
that we have a long way to go but my view is that collectively as a
country, we need to keep reinforcing the social contract and you’ll find
that the leadership at the ministerial level will get stronger and
stronger.”
Nigeria’s Rising Debt Very Scary, Says Ezekwesili
Also speaking on the economy, former
Minister of Education and Senior Economic Advisor, African Economic
Development Policy Initiative (AEDPI), Dr. Oby Ezekwesili, has described
Nigeria’s rising debt as very scary and a source for concern.
Ezekwesili, while speaking to the press,
yesterday at the sidelines of the Morocco-Nigeria Relations event with
the theme: Enhancing Opportunities for Growth and Development in Abuja,
stated that the country does have a debt issue.
According to her, “You can’t deal with the revenue issue in isolation from the debt issue. The truth is that you have different indicators that you use in measuring your debt sustainability. The one that the government likes, is the one that says to it that you have plenty of headroom to borrow and that’s the one that measures the percentage of the ratio to debt and the GDP.
“It has become a blunt instrument,
because if you’re not with the capacity to service your debt, then you
are already in crisis, you’re in trouble. You won’t even produce any
additional GDP.
“Today, our GDP, our debt service to revenue is 69 per cent hovering around 70 per cent. That’s very scary, so it is something that needs to be worked on. We need to look at the kind of reforms that will enlarge the productivity of our GDP as it is and triple it as much as possible.”
Ezekwesili added, “Our own GDP is about
$375 billion today, our GDP per capital is about $1,968. That of Morocco
109 billion for the GDP and 3,109 GDP per capital.
“Now, these are low levels, these are
low numbers. We have the capacity to triple these GDP levels. The more
that we can collaborate, the more that we can find regional integration
basis, to do things with business to business, government to government
and people to people. The better for the two countries.
“By so doing, it can then be the drivers
of even more integration within not just our sub region but the
continent, and then to look towards the rest of the world on the basis
of higher productivity and competitiveness”.
The presidential candidate of the Allied Congress Party of Nigeria (ACPN), however said, “Until we are able to think in a very holistic and comprehensive way about this, we might be continuously substituting the necessary visionary reforms that we need in Key sectors of the economy for debt.”
On his part, Managing Director, OCP
Policy Center, Karim El Anynaoui, said over the past three, four years,
Morocco and Nigeria had deepened their relations.
He noted that there are things happening
on the ground. Sighting the fertilizer sector as an example, he said
that his country had been supporting the presidential fertilizer
initiative in Nigeria.
According to him, “We made sure to
provide appropriate, tailor made and affordable price for the farmers.
So, there are things going on, and there are other sectors where
discussions and potential for cooperation is ongoing, particularly in
the energy sector.”
0 comments:
Post a Comment